Ironically in the age of AI the value of data increases even more than the big data era.
Effective data governance ensures that data is understood, trusted, secure, and usable across the business. It defines how data should be managed, who is responsible for it, and how it supports both innovation and compliance. And when governance is done right, it becomes a powerful enabler rather than a barrier — accelerating analytics, reducing risk, and improving the quality of every insight.
Table of Contents
- What Is a Data Governance Strategy?
- Why Is It Important?
- Start With “Why”
- Offensive vs Defensive Data Governance
- Who Is Responsible for Data Management?
- What Are the Data Roles?
- Why Is Executive-Level Buy-In Required?
- 10 Step Checklist for Setting Up Data Governance with Microsoft Purview
- 1. Begin With a Clear Governance Operating Model
- 2. Automate Discovery: Build Your Data Map
- 3. Define the Business Language: Glossaries and Ontologies
- 4. Classify and Protect Data With Consistent Policies
- 5. Establish Lineage for Trust and Compliance
- 6. Implement Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC) and Data Policies
- 7. Create a Data Governance Command Centre
- 8. Embed Governance in Projects and Product Teams
- 9. Scale With a Federated Model (Data Mesh Friendly)
- 10. Governance as a Culture, Not a Tool
- Conclusion
What Is a Data Governance Strategy?
A data governance strategy is the operating model through which an organization ensures its data assets are managed in alignment with business goals — not just technically, but culturally, operationally, and ethically.
It defines how the organisation will:
- Define roles and responsibilities for data.
- Set policies, standards and processes for data collection, curation, usage, protection and retirement.
- Align data management practices with strategic objectives: analytics, compliance, cost-efficiency, innovation.
- Monitor and measure the effectiveness of governance efforts.
When data is treated as a strategic asset rather than a by-product, governance becomes the mechanism that turns raw data into trustable, usable, accessible information.
Why Is It Important?
At its essence, data governance matters because without it, data becomes unpredictable — costly, risky and under-utilised.
- It enables reliable decision-making by raising the baseline quality, consistency and reliability of data.
- It safeguards risk and compliance by establishing frameworks for access, lineage, classification, retention and disposal.
- It unlocks value by enabling broader, faster, safer use of data across the enterprise rather than siloed pockets of capability.
- It supports cost-efficiency: fewer duplicates, less rework, fewer errors and better self-service.
- It underpins trust — both internally (business users trusting data) and externally (regulators, partners, customers trusting you handle their data responsibly).
In today’s era of AI, analytics at scale, cloud data lakes and regulatory scrutiny, the margin for error has shrunk. Governance isn’t optional — it is foundational.
Start With “Why”
A common pitfall in governance programs is beginning with the “what” (policy library, portal, toolset) or the “how” (processes, technology) and neglecting the “why.” Effective governance begins with an articulation of why this matters for YOUR organisation.
- What business outcomes will improved governance enable? (Faster analytics, reduced risk, cost savings, new revenue streams)
- What are the pain-points now? (Poor data quality, compliance breaches, duplication, slow insights)
- How will governance enable agility, not hinder it — by enabling trusted data reuse and self-service rather than gatekeeping?
This “why” becomes your anchor. It aligns stakeholders and creates a narrative in which governance is enabler, not blocker. Without this, governance efforts risk being perceived as overhead or bureaucracy rather than value-creation.
Offensive vs Defensive Data Governance
Governance often gets positioned as a defensive discipline — avoid risk, comply with regulations, lock down data access. That framing is valid, but limiting. A more powerful stance is to treat governance offensively — as a strategic lever for growth, innovation and differentiation.
- Defensive governance: Focuses on protection, compliance, risk mitigation, preventing data breaches or misuse.
- Offensive governance: Focuses on enabling better data use, faster insights, trusted data products, internal data marketplaces, analytics at scale, data-driven business models.
The best governance strategies balance both. They build controls that protect, while simultaneously enabling and accelerating value. Organisations that lean too heavily on the defensive side risk slowing down innovation; those that ignore the defensive side risk regulatory or reputational fallout.
Who Is Responsible for Data Management?
Governance without accountability is destined to be ineffective. Identifying who owns what — and making their accountability visible — is a critical step.
- Data Owners are typically senior business leaders responsible for the outcomes of their data domains; they own the decisions about data access, usage, quality and value.
- Data Stewards manage the day-to-day governance tasks: maintaining glossaries, ensuring data definitions, overseeing data quality, supporting lineage and metadata.
- Data Custodians / IT/Data Platform Teams implement technical controls, ensure systems and services comply with governance policy, enforce access and architecture design.
Clear role definitions and role-specific responsibilities ensure that governance isn’t an abstract program, but a lived discipline embedded into operations.
What Are the Data Roles?
Here are core roles that underpin governance and the responsibilities each carries:
| Role | Primary responsibility | Typical role in governance framework |
|---|---|---|
| Data Owner | Accountability for domain-level outcomes (quality, usage, value) | Business or functional senior leader |
| Data Steward | Day-to-day governance across specific data assets | Often business-tech hybrid role |
| Data Custodian | Implements and manages technical environment and controls | IT or Data Platform team |
| Governance Office / Domain Owner | Defines policy, ensures oversight, escalates issues | Central team with cross-domain remit |
| Data Consumer | Uses data products, requests access, flags issues | Analysts, BI users, business users |
In larger, federated enterprises, these roles may be further specialised (e.g., Data Product Owner, Metadata Steward, Domain Data Owner). The key is clarity of accountability and consistent role-language so everyone understands who does what.
Why Is Executive-Level Buy-In Required?
Governance is not a tool or project — it’s an operational capability. That means it requires investment, visibility, and sustained sponsorship from senior leadership.
Reasons why executive-level buy-in is critical:
- Strategic alignment: Governance must reflect business strategy, not just IT agendas. Senior leadership ensures alignment and ensures data governance becomes business-embedded rather than technology-driven.
- Resource allocation: Stewards, platforms, training, change management — governance demands resources over time, not just a one-off implementation.
- Culture and change management: Data behaviour, cross-functional collaboration, responsibility accountability — these require culture shift which is only sustainable with senior support.
- Policy enforcement and escalation: Governance often raises hard questions (data access, competing priorities, data ownership) that require escalation beyond individual teams. Executive sponsorship ensures these issues are resolved.
- Metrics and benefits realisation: The value of governance (reduced risk, faster insights, cost mitigation) must be visible to the organisation; senior leaders champion the outcomes and hold the organisation to account.
Without this level of buy-in, governance initiatives frequently stall, become siloed, or are perceived as overhead rather than value-driving.
10 Step Checklist for Setting Up Data Governance with Microsoft Purview
Microsoft Purview is the governance backbone for modern data estates — a unified platform that brings together data discovery, classification, lineage, cataloguing, access control, and regulatory compliance under one organisational lens.
Where many governance programs fail because they rely on documents, spreadsheets, and fragmented stewardship, Purview succeeds by translating policy into discoverable, actionable, automated controls.
This section explains how to think about Purview when setting up governance the right way — not as a tool to install, but as the operational system that enforces your governance strategy.
1. Begin With a Clear Governance Operating Model
Purview amplifies your governance model — it doesn’t create one for you.
Before turning on any Purview capability, articulate:
- Domains: What business domains exist? Sales, Finance, Operations, Clinical, Supply Chain, etc.
- Owners: Who owns each domain and is accountable for data quality and access decisions?
- Stewards: Who manages definitions, metadata, and day-to-day granularity?
- Governance Office: Who sets the rules at the organisational level?
Purview maps directly onto this structure.
Without it, your Purview environment becomes a technical catalogue rather than a governance system.
2. Automate Discovery: Build Your Data Map
The first step in operationalising governance is creating a Data Map — Purview’s knowledge graph of all your data assets across cloud, on-premises, SaaS, and Fabric.
This includes scanning:
- Databases and warehouses
- Data lakes and lakehouses
- Power BI datasets and reports
- Files, folders, object storage
- Line-of-business systems (ERP, HR, finance systems)
Once scanned, Purview automatically captures:
- Metadata (names, schemas, owners)
- Classifications (PII, PHI, financial fields)
- Lineage (how data flows from source → transform → dashboard)
This shifts governance from guesswork to fact — data becomes visible, traceable, and auditable across the estate.
3. Define the Business Language: Glossaries and Ontologies
Technical metadata alone doesn’t drive trust.
Business users need a shared, unambiguous vocabulary.
This is where the Business Glossary comes in.
Use Purview to define:
- Key business terms
- Data definitions
- Policies around usage
- Ownership responsibility
For example:
“Customer” should not have five conflicting definitions across teams.
Purview ensures definitions are unified, versioned, discoverable, and tied to actual data assets.
This creates a shared organisational memory, improves data literacy, and reduces friction between business and technical teams.
4. Classify and Protect Data With Consistent Policies
Once assets are discovered, the next step is classification — Purview automatically labels sensitive data such as:
- Personal Identifiable Information (PII)
- Financial data
- Healthcare data (HIPAA, PHI)
- Security-sensitive fields
Policies can then be applied at scale:
- Access controls
- Masking rules
- Retention policies
- Data movement restrictions
This moves governance away from manual, system-by-system rules into centralised, consistent, enforceable policy.
5. Establish Lineage for Trust and Compliance
Purview’s lineage features allow you to visualise how data flows through your organisation:
Dataset → Transformation Pipeline → Lakehouse → Semantic Model → Report.
Why this matters:
- Trust: Users can see how a number is produced, reducing ambiguity.
- Auditing: Regulators can trace how sensitive fields transform over time.
- Impact Analysis: When a source changes, Purview highlights everything downstream affected.
- Root-cause Analysis: Broken datasets and failed transformations become easier to diagnose.
Lineage turns governance into a living system — not a static policy document.
6. Implement Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC) and Data Policies
Purview integrates with Azure AD and Microsoft Fabric to manage who has access to what and why.
This includes:
- Data owners approving access
- Stewards validating definitions
- Custodians enforcing technical controls
- Auto-generated access reviews
- Data policies for Fabric, SQL, storage, and Power BI
Governance becomes embedded in the access workflow, ensuring compliance without slowing down productivity.
7. Create a Data Governance Command Centre
Purview becomes most powerful when paired with:
- Dashboards for data health
- Scorecards for data quality
- KPI tracking (coverage, freshness, usage)
- Alerts for sensitive data proliferation
This transforms governance into an operational capability — measurable, auditable, and continuously improving.
8. Embed Governance in Projects and Product Teams
A common failure mode is treating governance as a one-time project.
Purview enables continuous governance, but only if embedded in operational workflows:
- Every new dataset must have an owner and steward.
- Every data product must register in Purview.
- Every domain must keep metadata fresh and accurate.
- Every deployment must consider lineage and sensitivity.
Purview is not “IT’s tool”.
It is the organisation’s governance platform.
9. Scale With a Federated Model (Data Mesh Friendly)
Purview supports both centralised and federated governance.
This aligns naturally with Data Mesh principles:
- Domains own their data products.
- The central team sets standards and policies.
- Purview provides alignment, interoperability, and enforcement.
This balance empowers teams while maintaining enterprise-wide governance discipline.
10. Governance as a Culture, Not a Tool
Purview is powerful, but it’s not magic.
The real work is cultural:
- Clear roles
- Shared definitions
- Leadership buy-in
- Stewardship accountability
- Consistent adoption
Conclusion
Data governance isn’t a policy exercise — it’s the foundation of every analytics, AI, and data product initiative. When roles are clear, data is discoverable, definitions are aligned, and policies are automated, organisations unlock trust, agility, and long-term value from their data.
Microsoft Purview strengthens that foundation by turning governance into an operational system: one place to map your data estate, define your business language, enforce policies, track lineage, and embed stewardship directly into how teams work. It transforms governance from a static document into a living capability.
If you’d like to see how governance ties directly into modern architecture and capacity strategy, join our upcoming session: Capacity Management and Medallion Architecture on Fabric
Leave a Reply